Qzino vs Shock
A neutral, data-led comparison of Qzino and Shock — independent trust ratings, observed on-chain volume and mapped reserves, side by side.
Updated continuously from indexed on-chain data and third-party ratings.
| Metric | Qzino | Shock |
|---|---|---|
| Blended trust (0–100) | 64 | 70 |
| casino.guru Safety (/10) | 7.1 | 7.2 |
| AskGamblers expert (/10) | — | — |
| Trustpilot (/5) | 2.8 | 3.4 |
| 7d on-chain volume | $918.5K | $303.3K |
| Mapped reserves | $491.8K | $176.6K |
| Active counterparties (7d) | 359 | 44 |
| Chains tracked | 2 | 1 |
On our recommended metric — a blend of independent third-party trust ratings — Shock currently scores higher (70 vs 64 / 100). On-chain volume differences are shown for context only and are not a quality signal — volume is easily inflated by wash trading.
Full profiles
See the full trust ranking (our recommended ordering — not volume), or how the blended score is built in the methodology.
Methodology & disclaimer. Figures are derived from on-chain transfers attributed to wallets we associate with each operator, plus third-party ratings shown with their source. Blockchain attribution carries inherent uncertainty, and reserves are an all-chain best-effort estimate from mapped wallets — coverage varies by operator. These pages describe observed activity and third-party data only; they are not an endorsement of any operator and not a statement on any operator's solvency, legality, fairness, or safety, and nothing here is financial, legal or investment advice. See how we attribute on-chain activity · about us · report a correction. Data updates roughly every 30 minutes. 18+ only. Gambling can be addictive — see responsible gambling resources.