Cloudbet vs Dicey
A neutral, data-led comparison of Cloudbet and Dicey — independent trust ratings, observed on-chain volume and mapped reserves, side by side.
Updated continuously from indexed on-chain data and third-party ratings.
| Metric | Cloudbet | Dicey |
|---|---|---|
| Blended trust (0–100) | 85 | 75 |
| casino.guru Safety (/10) | 9.2 | 7.3 |
| AskGamblers expert (/10) | — | — |
| Trustpilot (/5) | 3.6 | 3.8 |
| 7d on-chain volume | $3.0M | $1.5M |
| Mapped reserves | $8.2M | $615.5K |
| Active counterparties (7d) | 204 | 14 |
| Chains tracked | 2 | 1 |
On our recommended metric — a blend of independent third-party trust ratings — Cloudbet currently scores higher (85 vs 75 / 100). On-chain volume differences are shown for context only and are not a quality signal — volume is easily inflated by wash trading.
Full profiles
See the full trust ranking (our recommended ordering — not volume), or how the blended score is built in the methodology.
Methodology & disclaimer. Figures are derived from on-chain transfers attributed to wallets we associate with each operator, plus third-party ratings shown with their source. Blockchain attribution carries inherent uncertainty, and reserves are an all-chain best-effort estimate from mapped wallets — coverage varies by operator. These pages describe observed activity and third-party data only; they are not a statement on any operator's solvency, legality, fairness, or safety, and nothing here is financial advice. See how we attribute on-chain activity. Data updates roughly every 30 minutes.