BC.Game vs Shock
A neutral, data-led comparison of BC.Game and Shock — independent trust ratings, observed on-chain volume and mapped reserves, side by side.
Updated continuously from indexed on-chain data and third-party ratings.
| Metric | BC.Game | Shock |
|---|---|---|
| Blended trust (0–100) | 79 | 70 |
| casino.guru Safety (/10) | 6.9 | 7.2 |
| AskGamblers expert (/10) | — | — |
| Trustpilot (/5) | — | 3.4 |
| 7d on-chain volume | $69.8M | $306.5K |
| Mapped reserves | $5.3M | $176.5K |
| Active counterparties (7d) | 14,858 | 48 |
| Chains tracked | 9 | 1 |
On our recommended metric — a blend of independent third-party trust ratings — BC.Game currently scores higher (79 vs 70 / 100). On-chain volume differences are shown for context only and are not a quality signal — volume is easily inflated by wash trading.
Full profiles
See the full trust ranking (our recommended ordering — not volume), or how the blended score is built in the methodology.
Methodology & disclaimer. Figures are derived from on-chain transfers attributed to wallets we associate with each operator, plus third-party ratings shown with their source. Blockchain attribution carries inherent uncertainty, and reserves are an all-chain best-effort estimate from mapped wallets — coverage varies by operator. These pages describe observed activity and third-party data only; they are not an endorsement of any operator and not a statement on any operator's solvency, legality, fairness, or safety, and nothing here is financial, legal or investment advice. See how we attribute on-chain activity · about us · report a correction. Data updates roughly every 30 minutes. 18+ only. Gambling can be addictive — see responsible gambling resources.